Spend your time on the science, not the screening
Build a rigorous review without the manual scaffolding, keep the method transparent enough to publish, and trace every conclusion back to the source.
A systematic review should not consume the research it supports
For a PhD student or research group, methodological rigor is non-negotiable. The manual workload is the real problem, and reviewer time is scarce. Too often, the review either consumes the research it was meant to support or quietly cuts corners.
- Months of screening before the real analysis begins
- Methodology hard to document transparently
- Limited reviewer time for dual appraisal
- Conclusions hard to trace back in peer review
You keep the science. Aibstracts carries the scaffolding
Rigor without the manual burden
You go from a research question to a running search in one workflow, so the review supports your research instead of competing with it.
Methodology you can show
Protocol versions, screening reasons, and appraisal answers are all recorded and exportable, so transparency is automatic when a supervisor or journal asks.
Conclusions you can trace back
Every judgment and extracted fact links to the exact passage in the PDF, which makes defending your review in peer review straightforward.
Dual appraisal without doubling the burden
Structured workflows and recorded decisions make scarce reviewer time go further when a second pair of eyes is required.
- PRISMA-ready workflow
- Source-grounded outputs
- Protocol version history
- Reviewer-controlled decisions
Systematic review teams
PRISMA-ready reviews with the audit trail built as you work, and appraisal consistency that holds whether one reviewer or ten screen.
See the SLR workflowMedical device evidence teams
CER and PMS/PMCF evidence a notified body can follow end to end. Updates re-run on the same trail, not rebuilt from scratch.
See the CER workflowPharma / HEOR / evidence strategy
SLRs and evidence landscapes with submission-grade appraisal consistency. Payer narratives that trace to source on demand.
See the HEOR workflowStart your review today
The free evaluation covers one bounded question end to end, with no card required.
Thirty minutes with the founder, no sales qualification call first